The full library in alphabetical order, across every area of law.
A forum may decline to apply the law of another state that its conflicts analysis would otherwise select, where applying it would violate a strong public policy of the forum. The threshold is high: a difference in rule, even a substantial one, is not enough, and courts have consistently said that applying another state's law is not made objectionable by disagreeing with it.
A residency examination asks where a person actually was and where their life was centered, and it is resolved on documentary evidence. Auditors request day-by-day location records, travel bookings and boarding passes, credit and debit card transaction histories, toll and transit records, mobile phone location and call records, utility consumption at each property, building access logs, employment calendars, and medical and professional appointment records.
A defendant must generally file a notice of removal within thirty days after receiving the initial pleading, or after service of summons where that is required first. Where the case is not removable as initially pleaded, a second thirty-day period runs from receipt of an amended pleading, motion, order or other paper from which removability can first be ascertained.
The six-month period is counted backwards from the day the proceeding began and must be consecutive, but a temporary absence from the state counts as part of the period rather than breaking it. That single allowance carries most of the difficulty: courts must decide whether a given absence was a pause or a departure, and they do it on the surrounding arrangements rather than on stated intentions. A separate rule covers children under six months old.
In the absence of an effective choice-of-law clause, most states identify the law of the state with the most significant relationship to the transaction and the parties. Five contacts are considered: the place of contracting, the place of negotiation, the place of performance, the location of the subject matter, and the parties' domicile, residence, nationality, place of incorporation and place of business.
Every state sets its own test for who pays the resident rate at its public institutions, built from three ingredients: physical presence for a stated period, intent to remain, and financial independence from a parent living elsewhere. None of them is a federal immigration category. A student can hold permanent residence and fail the test after moving last month, or hold no federal status and satisfy it after four years at a local high school.
Getting licensed in a second state ordinarily happens by one of three routes. Reciprocity rests on an agreement between states with equivalent standards and is the lightest but the least common. Endorsement, the workhorse route, asks the board to accept a license held elsewhere provided the applicant's original qualifications were substantially equivalent and they have practiced for a stated period without discipline. Examination means meeting the state's requirements from the beginning.
Nearly every state takes the position that a practitioner treating a patient located in the state is practicing in that state and requires a license or a recognized privilege there. The practitioner's own location is irrelevant. Exceptions exist and are narrow: consultation with a treating practitioner rather than with the patient, follow-up for an established patient temporarily out of state in some jurisdictions, emergencies, and specific telehealth registration schemes.
Parallel proceedings arise where the same or related disputes are pending in more than one court — two state courts, a state and a federal court, or two federal districts. Between federal districts the first-filed rule generally gives priority to the earlier action, and transfer or consolidation follows. Between state and federal courts, both may proceed concurrently, because federal courts have a strong obligation to exercise the jurisdiction given to them. Stays are available but exceptional.
Issue-by-issue analysis, sometimes called depecage, follows from the way the modern choice-of-law test is framed: the question is which state has the most significant relationship to the issue in question. Because different issues implicate different contacts and different policies, a single dispute can be governed by one state's law on the standard of care, another's on damages, and a third's on a limitation defense.
A benefits agency assessing an applicant queries a federal verification system about that person's status. The query is about the applicant, it returns a status answer, and it is made because the program's eligibility rules require it. Separately, agencies exchange data for program integrity purposes under agreements that specify what may be shared and for what.
A board considering an applicant licensed elsewhere asks for identity and eligibility documents, primary source verification of education, examination and every license ever held, evidence of recent practice, continuing education records, a criminal background check, and disclosures covering discipline, malpractice, impairment and criminal history. Most of the elapsed time is spent waiting on third parties, and most of the difficulty comes from the disclosures rather than the credentials.
